empathy (part 1)

empathy
[ˈempəTHē]
NOUN

  1. the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

ORIGIN

early 20th century: from Greek empatheia (from em- ‘in’ + pathos ‘feeling’) translating German Einfühlung.

Empathy is the capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place oneself in another’s position.”

When we view a person as anything else, we allow for biases to takeover. We allow ourselves to dehumanize each other and allow for fear. When we spend the time and empathize with another being by feeling their pain and their sufferings we can get beyond our biases and come to understand them. We would understand that we are not so different. Our stories are not that different and scientifically speaking we are the same. We are 99.9% similar. When we look for differences, we will find it, it is confirmation bias and it  perpetuates an endless cycle of biases and fear.

Fear is an animal like instinct. It was meant to protect us in the wild when we were the weakest of the species roaming Earth. This was well before our technology overcame any physical shortcomings we have as a species. The fear we now face is produced by fellow humans. Sometimes produced intentionally to assert power over another. Fear is the easiest idea to instill into another. The fear of the unknown, the fear of something different, the fear of loss, etc. The Nazi’s used this fear quite well as did many dictators. Making each of us different when we are not that different.

These tactics were used throughout history and continues to be used today. It is effective because it plays into our innate biases. These biases had its purpose for the survival of our ancestors, but it is no longer needed. We must start thinking about how to change this within our societies.

I believe that teaching empathy at all levels of schooling is the best way to change this dynamic. It is also quite easy to do. Even simply adding in-class social experiments while teaching history would be significant. If we were all more emphatic would we be willing to hurt another person for gain? Would we be willing to hurt another person because they look different?

We need something different. (Part 1)

We have had some interesting election cycles since 2016. The 2016 presidential election showed how people wanted something different. If we simply look at the passion on social media, you can see that people are angry. We are angry because it has been the same repeatedly. The wealthy continues to get wealthier; the inequality gap continues to widen … We are tired of the status quo and yet, nothing has changed for a long time.

I will disclaim here that I personally decided to abstain my 2016 presidential vote. This is because I was sick of having to choose between two candidates and pick which candidate I disliked less. Why are our choices a matter of choosing between two parties? I believe that having only two parties to vote for is putting us in this predicament.

Having a two-party system is like a market segment that only has two Companies, or a duopoly. If Company A and Company B are the only options eventually, then they have the power to dictate everything and we would not have a choice. A two-party system is similar. Eventually, the two parties will only speak the language that makes their corporate donors and lobbyists happy. There is no incentive to listen to the people because our voice does not really matter when the two parties become nearly identical with only the occasional pandering to the masses that might make us thing it is different. We the people, lost our voices over time but we lost our voices.

There were third-party candidates in the running during the 2016 election cycle. When some of these candidates gained momentum, we argued that voting for them would be a wasted vote or a vote for the opposing candidate. But who told us that our votes would be wasted? If every vote counts why would voting for a third-party not count?

I believe that our vote is truly our voice. Without at least 15% of votes for these third parties, they cannot debate with the other candidates. This stands at odds with the 5% requirement to get public funding. Regardless of these requirements, having a third party gives another viewpoint and voice to the policies that need attention. If we continue to say that voting for a third party is a waste and not viable then a third-party will never happen, and we will maintain our status quo.

I believe it is crucial that we vote with our values regardless of what everyone else says otherwise your voice is always being shaped to something not our own. Our government was founded with a system of checks and balances.  This system has three branches.  Why shouldn’t we have a third party to check and balance the other two?

What is the cost?

These are interesting times.  We are living in the consequences of our previous generations decisions. It is the most evident it has been since information travels much faster and it seems our actions have larger consequences than ever before as well.

I hope this is an opportunity for our generation to evolve and act in a way that shows true understanding of the consequences of our actions.  To know the true cost of a thing.  What is the true cost of wanting products ever cheaper?

Cheaper product means a company needs to manufacture at a cheaper rate.  It means finding cheaper labor rates.  It means taking the jobs to the “third world countries”.  It means having it completely made in another country where materials are cheaper.  It means “Made in China”.  It means buying a product made with less oversight.  It means poisonous kids toys, toxic dog food, or factories with high worker suicide rates due to inhumane working conditions.  It means factories collapsing and taking the lives of workers due to lack of oversight.  Is it really worth these consequences?  What about our food?  What is the true cost of factory farming our food?  What does it mean for “conventional farming” to be cheaper than organically grown?

Factory farming our food means using machines designed for specific crops.  Practices that work for specific crops only.  It means trading efficiencies for thousands of years of farming practices and wisdom.  It means farming the same crop over and over again.  Breaking away from the current format I would like to dive deeper into the food topic.  This is a topic that rings loudly with me since, I like to eat good and healthy food every day and I hope you do as well.

With factory farming we are depleting the nutrients in the soil by growing the same crop over and over again.  Just think about it.  How can any nutrient be available when the same crop is grown repeatedly on the same plot of land?  Modern day fertilization uses nitrate to improve growth it provides no nutrients and it is simply used to make the plant grow bigger and faster.  The human body is more complex than the crops we grow, but as an analogy, it would be similar to humans sustaining on carbs only.  If it were possible, this person would be no more than a shell.  The nutrients we get from our produce comes from the ground.  Modern day farming is all about mass production.  It depletes the soil of nutrients and is heavily poisoned with pesticides.  Which we have to use more and more of because the pests are adapting to the poisons we use.  Weeds, insects, bacteria, and viruses have a much faster evolution cycle than we do.  Consistently speaking these pesticides are having to become more and more toxic because the pests are adapting.  Now we have to genetically modify the plants just so they can handle the poisons.  We would be naïve if we didn’t think the pesticides aren’t being absorbed by the crops. It’s only a matter of time before we must genetically modify ourselves, so that we can handle the poisons we are pumping into our food.  Eating any animal is possibly even worse than eating vegetables.  We can at least wash some of the toxins from the produce but not the meat.  They have been consuming mostly GMO corn which is heavily toxified by every synthetic spray we have made.  This doesn’t even include all the drugs that are pumped into factory raised livestock.  While these toxins do get processed by the livestock but how much of it is processed?  What are we putting in our bodies?  What are you feeding your family?  Your children?  What are the consequences to your health?

It seems we have grown accustomed to cheaper, more convenient, faster, etc. for something that is only doing us more harm rather being truly beneficial.  In wanting cheaper food, we are getting less nutrients and possibly more toxins.  However, I feel that we are at a turning point.  People are becoming aware that something is wrong with our food supply.  The increase in obesity, diabetes, food allergies is increasing dramatically.  In wanting cheaper products, we are losing jobs and getting products that could poison our loved ones.  This isn’t simply due to more efficient information gathering.  This is a malignant tumor formed from our choices.

Next time you go grocery shopping try an organic celery compared to a “conventionally grown” celery or tomato or even a factory raised piece of chicken compared to a pasture raised chicken.  You’ll taste the difference without a doubt.  Next time you buy a shirt from Abercrombie & Fitch think about how quickly that shirt falls apart. Think about the people who have died working in a factory that collapsed.  Is saving a few dollars’ worth having to buy the shirt again in less than a year or the factory worker that died in a factory?

What is the true cost of your purchase?